Toyota land cruiser car, first of all, my favorite. Is there a better SUV? Even if I am wrong, then what? I like things. I am not alone in my mind. Corner Toyota employees are long enough that they will eventually admit that although they only sell 3,000 $ 86,000 off-road vehicles every year we can rest in the voice of the land cruiser as the knowledge of the heart and soul in North America’s efforts. The largest cruiser is important as a company, although the sales are low and will not go away. Nor is it its twins, Lexus LX.
However, Lexus GX may be. In other parts of the world known as the Toyota Prado, you’d better be able to think of the GX Land Cruiser. GX sales are slow, Lexus feels a need for a more traditional three-row all-in-one luxury SUV with high cost and high capacity Audi Q7s and Mercedes-Benz gl’s world. Instead of Prado, Toyota has been selling the American 4 runner for over 30 years. Interesting Facts: 5.2% of the world’s vehicles are more than 200,000 miles are 4 runners. All of the above suv evil earth, rock, earth, and all things. So I like them. Should not be surprised, I also completely dig 2017 Sequoia.
The biggest Toyota is fittingly named after the world’s biggest tree—redwoods are taller, but Sequoiadendron giganteum are the largest living things on Earth. The Sequoia is the only SUV whose name contains all the vowels. Think about it. Sequoia might as well contain all the consonants, too, because the SUV is truly massive, tipping the scales at 6,081 pounds. For a little perspective, the last Chevrolet Tahoe we tested, a 2015 4WD LTZ model, weighed in at 5,744 pounds. We also happened to weigh a same vintage Chevy Suburban 4WD LTZ, and that longer American undercut the bulging Japanese people-hauler by 129 pounds, coming in at 5,952 pounds. The Suburban-based, mack daddy Cadillac Escalade ESV weighed 6,027 pounds. The regular-length Escalade weighs 5,870 pounds. You should know that the Tahoe has a 116-inch wheelbase, whereas the Suburban sports 130 inches between the wheel centers. The body-on-frame Sequoia neatly splits the difference with a 122-inch wheelbase. Basically, the Sequoia is big.
Luckily, Toyota outfitted the Sequoia with a proper engine, the family 5.7-liter naturally aspirated V-8, which for Sequoia duty makes 381 horsepower and 401 lb-ft of torque. All that power is enough to muscle the Sequoia to 60 mph in 6.6 seconds. The quarter mile happens in 15.2 seconds at 91 mph. That’s quick enough to smoke the 355-hp 5.3-liter Chevys, with the Tahoe needing 7.0 seconds and the Suburban requiring 7.3 to hit 60 mph. The same story is also true for the quarter mile, with the Tahoe taking 15.4 seconds at 90.6 mph and the big Suburban needing 15.7 seconds and only trapping at 88.6 miles per hour. The Cadillacs, with their beefier 420-hp 6.2-liter V-8s, are a bit quicker. The short-wheelbase Escalade hits 60 mph in 6.2 seconds and does the quarter mile in 14.6 at 97.0 mph. The ESV Slade hits 60 mph even more quickly—6.1 seconds—and dusts off the quarter in 14.6 seconds at 95.2 mph. A couple more for you: The 5,879-pound, 390-hp 5.6-liter V-8 powered Nissan Armada hits 60 mph in 6.3 seconds before finishing the quarter mile in 14.9 seconds at 94.0 mph. The Ford Expedition EL weighs 6,319 pounds, produces 365 hp from a 3.5-liter twin-turbo V-6, hits 60 mph in 6.5 seconds, and runs out the quarter mile in 15.1 at 90.3 mph.
As for handling, well, the less said the better. The Sequoia completed our figure-eight test in 29.1 seconds. That’s not surprising considering its heft and that at most it can pull 0.73 g’s laterally. The Tahoe completed the figure eight in 28.3 seconds. That’s a significant difference. We use a Chevrolet Tahoe every time we film an episode of Ignition or Head 2 Head, and I can tell you that the entire crew is typically impressed with the handling prowess of those big, old boats. The Suburban can run the figure eight in 28.4 seconds, whereas the two Cadillacs were good for 28.1 and 27.9 seconds, respectively. And no, I have no idea why the ESV was 0.2 second quicker than the shorty Caddy. The Sequoia stops from 60 mph in 130 feet. The Tahoe needs 121 feet, the Suburban 126 feet, the regular Escalade needed 129 feet, and the ESV required only 119 feet. Even though the Sequoia is back of the braking pack, at least it’s comparable.
But the numbers only tell part of the story. I drove this Sequoia from Escalante, Utah, in the dead of winter to Las Vegas before heading home to Los Angeles, and I think it’s performance there is the more important part. It’s one of the finest road-tripping machines I’ve driven in some time. First of all, the front seats are massive, quite possibly the largest thrones in the industry. I’m not really sure how to fact-check that assertion, but the huge seat backs were comfortable during such a long trip. The ride was also excellent, and when combined with those big front seats, it made the Sequoia as good as anything I’ve ridden more than 1,000 miles in. One road-trip gripe is the lousy infotainment system. We all found it so frustrating to program that we stopped bothering and just relied on our vastly superior phones and iPads to navigate. I’ve been told Toyota is aware that their infotainment system is among the worst in the business. It simply doesn’t care. Smartphone it is then. Besides, even if the Sequoia had Apple CarPlay, you still can’t run Google Maps or Waze. So you might as well use your phone.
My other big road trip gripe is the cruise control. I’ve long been a believer that every car has a speed it’s most comfortable going. To keep it in the Toyota family, the new Lexus IS 200t is happiest at 85 mph. Go figure. The Sequoia, with it’s big, angry-sounding V-8, loves to go about 70 mph. And that’s a fine speed. Unless you’re in Utah, where the speed limit is 80 mph. You set the radar cruise control at 85 mph, kick back, and relax. Before you know it, you’re watching your speed fall. Huh? Well, the first problem, as my director Anthony Esposito pointed out, is that there’s no BMW mode. Meaning even when assigned to the closest setting, you’re still what feels like 500 feet from the car in front of you. I want to be on someone’s bumper. Because with a gap that large, people are always jumping in front of you, leading to the second problem. When the radar sees a car come across the Sequoia’s bow, it deactivates the cruise control. I spoke with a Toyota engineer about making their cruise control work better and was told something to the effect of, “Powertrain and electronics are separate departments.” Great.
All that said, my gripes with the Sequoia (pitiful fuel economy—13.6 mpg observed on the freeway uphill, 13.7 mpg downhill) are few, and the things I enjoyed about it are many, starting with that lovely V-8, which will soon be replaced by a twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 mated to a 10-speed automatic transmission. How many full-size SUVs can you think of that sound so good? Basically, only the 6.2-liter versions of GM’s big dogs make such sweet music. And did I mention how nice the materials in the interior are?
Not many people need a body-on-frame, three-row SUV with low gears. However, should you find yourself embroiled in a cross-country road trip with a few of your closest co-workers, their stuff, and camera gear atop a 9,000-foot mountain pass in the middle of a blizzard, I highly recommend the Toyota Sequoia. Like all the other large Toyota SUVs I’ve driven, I was disappointed when it came time to hand the keys back while hatching a plan to somehow get them back. Long live real trucks. Long live the giants.
|2017 Toyota Sequoia 4×4 Platinum|
|PRICE AS TESTED||$66,724|
|VEHICLE LAYOUT||Front-engine, 4WD, 6-pass, 4-door SUV|
|ENGINE||5.7L/381-hp/401-lb-ft DOHC 32-valve V-8|
|CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST)||6,081 lb (50/50%)|
|LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT||205.1 x 79.9 x 74.6 in|
|0-60 MPH||6.6 sec|
|QUARTER MILE||15.2 sec @ 91.0 mph|
|BRAKING, 60-0 MPH||130 ft|
|LATERAL ACCELERATION||0.73 g (avg)|
|MT FIGURE EIGHT||29.1 sec @ 0.57 g (avg)|
|EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON||13/17/14 mpg|
|ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY||259/198 kW-hrs/100 miles|
|CO2 EMISSIONS, COMB||1.33 lb/mile|